7 Apr
2006
7 Apr
'06
10:53 a.m.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, carmen wrote:
Would you like to elaborate on that?
i'd just rather not see a bunch of workaround hacks packaged with the 'object' prefix, i think it should be reserved for something builtin. for an example of this, see Ruby's "Object" object.. diagram of the day: http://rhg.rubyforge.org/images/ch_object_classtree.png
this one is cool too:
http://rhg.rubyforge.org/images/ch_class_simulate.png
i find this one funnier though:
http://rhg.rubyforge.org/images/ch_class_mmm.png
obviously, the "mmm" in the filename stands for metametameta.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada