10 Apr
2008
10 Apr
'08
7:22 p.m.
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
exactly! the entire keyword thing is rather a mess anyhow, and i don't think it should be mimicked anywhere. introducing a new atomtype should be enough.
What happens to [t], [pack], [unpack], [route] with new atom types? why?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada