Hallo, Kyle Klipowicz hat gesagt: // Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
I think that hc is really just trying to build an awesome package to popularize pd. I know it's a pain in the rear to maintain code and manage source trees and such, but he has a serious drive to make this obscure-as-all-hell program more relevant to laypersons and non-programmers. This saves you guys a TON of work actually, since you won't be badgered by annoying newbie questions on the list re: this stuff, if people can just click an install button.
If more awareness can be made about pd, especially with high-quality plugins like ladspa and dssi, then people will be drawn toward it, and we will eventually gain more users, developers, and maintainers, and possibly more funding! How could that be a bad thing?
We do need to draw a line somewhere about what to include in a Pd distribution and what to leave out. Every software package has to decide such things, Max has to, Pd has to, Ardour has to, Firefox has to. And I would draw that line when it comes to plugins. DSSI and LADSPA are well defined interfaces that were designed with the main goal in mind, that plugin authors and the authors of plugin host software should be able to work independently. Including plugins in the Pd CVS would defy that underlying idea of DSSI and LADSPA.
Ciao