hi! i personally would not know what to change/add to the pd-core sources, but i thinks it's a very good idea to have this cvs-repository as a platform for tests and experiments. there needs to be a way to deal with the incresing number of people, who want to participate in this project. i always understood the the cvs that way, and never thought it would/could replace millers distribution.
[X] pro cvs
regards d13b
About changing the core of pd behind Millers back:
This was definitely not my intention, I rather tried to setup a repository for those who like to send patches to Miller, in order to have the possibility to test them, select those that fit and throw away those who are useless.
Finally Miller will have the say what he accepts for pd and what not. I think it is very important to make development for pd as open as possible, same for GEM. I am just trying to propose a "procedure" how to contribute to pd, because I think that several contributions may get lost because there is not an official way to do so.
We had several discussions about how to do that, and in order not to increase the load upon Miller I did it this way, maybe there are better ways ..., or maybe its a bad idea in general.
What do you think ?
Greetings
Guenter
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev