Hi Roman,If you do that over http then you don't have any way of knowing whether the data that you requested is the data that you get back. If you're going to be using this system, I'd suggest just hopping on the git user list and asking what is the best protocol to use by default for a publicly accessible repo of plugins in a free software community that isn't full of security experts.
If they suggest a setup like what IOhannes has implemented, then ignore everything I've written. If not, then you (or someone else who isn't me) might attempt revisiting this issue. -Jonathan
On Friday, October 16, 2015 8:42 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzent@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 16:15 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2015-07-30 11:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
ad #3 i really would like to split that huge repository into small projects (mainly: per-library). i've already started working on this on [1], which is nothing much to show yet, but in the end it should document the process and provide a way to re-play the conversion.
so i've done a first transition.
all the git-repositories can be found at
Great! Many thanks for all the effort.
they are browsable and can be cloned directly from the webpage. however, these repos are meant as starting points, so we do not provide *any write* access.
Ok, so what's the fuzz about non-secure connections when the repo's purpose is to _clone_ from it?
Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev