On Dec 2, 2005, at 4:46 AM, David Plans Casal wrote:
On 2 Dec 2005, at 09:32, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
If there is a majority then there has to be a population. If there's a population then there has to be a list of the electorate. So, who's allowed to vote and who's not?
Yes, we do need to define a collective decision process. But for such things, just a consensus of the pd-dev list has worked pretty well, i.e. post your suggested changes, and wait for some responses.
What if there is no response?
In the ASF, that's called 'lazy consensus'. You propose, wait for responses, and it in the absence of any, it is understood that you should just go ahead an JFDI.
Yeah, as long as you give it a few days. We can't all always be reading the list everyday.
.hc
d
-- David Plans Casal Researcher, UEA Studios d.casal at uea dot ac dot uk http://www.davidcasal.com
________________________________________________________________________ ____
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
- Eldridge Cleaver