On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:28:37PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
That's unless your code is so small it's not worth it, or that you are trying to do things flext can't do, or you already have a large investment in non-flext code and the switchover would be long, ...
Flext is worthy even for small externals; Saturday morning, I had to produce a Windows version of my ascii externals (not something I like to do, but some people I want to help are still being enslaved by M$). I was able to recompile flext and my externals in one hour, and I guess it would be the same to create a Max version.
The only problem is that flext is being linked statically to the compiled externals, which inflates the size of externals by ~ 80k; maybe there's a way to link flext dynamically...
-- Marc