On 09/26/2015 12:44 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On 25/09/15 23:04, Miller Puckette wrote:
I'd like to get a better understanding of all this n part because I'd like to incorporate deken into Pd vanilla assuming its developers are cool with that.
I don't know about IOhannes [who at this point has probably contributed more lines of code than me to deken] but I am definitely cool with that.
i think it's great.
i think there are still a few issues open that should be fixed before integrating the code¹
If this happened it would probably make sense to split the tcl plugin out to go into Pd vanilla and keep the deken packaging script as a separate project.
i don't think that the packaging script should be part of Pd.
gfmdsa IOhannes
¹ and then there is dekenception: it would be way easier to implement it if deken was included in Pd; but i doubt whether it would be accepted... ...but then i don't even know whether it makes sense