On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be the best thing to vectorize, but there are definitely vectorizable loops in Pd.
perhaps it would be a good start to reimplement newbytes(n) using memalign(16,n) instead of malloc(n).
Submit a patch to the tracker and we can try it out on the Pd- extended auto-builds. Does memalign() exist in Windows land?
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra