I'm curious about other's opinions...
True they seem to use the "stable" etc.. for example if your search for debian packages. I suppose debian does not release often enough for it to be a real problem, but perhaps since the files are archived, "stable" could be referring to something different than it currently means.
I submitted a bug about the 0.40 deb I tried, 0.39 worked like a charm.
No icon though, which would be nice since there is a nice one...
Also the new "10" fontsize looks a bit small for 10, more like 8... But since its consistent I'm happy!!
Thanks for the effort Hans!
.b.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yes, they are up to date. I was wondering which name newbies would find easier to understand. In Debian, I think the words "stable" and "testing" are used more. In Ubuntu, the names are more important. That's why I named them that way.
.hc
On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:29 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
Hey Hans++,
I'm happy to see debs in the nightly builds!!! yay!!!
One question though, have the debs been properly updated? As in etch is stable?
I think it would make more sense to use the proper names on debian, so we have an idea of exactly what distro they are for, even when a testing turns to stable (suddenly).
So I'm assuming they are up to date and "stable" means etch!!
Thanks. B. Bogart
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev