Hi,
it took this to pd-dev, because I think, pd-announce should better be reserved for announcements only - or what do you guys think?
günter geiger hat gesagt: // günter geiger wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Frank Barknecht wrote:
As usual: Please _don't_ report packaging-related Bugs to the Debian BTS, this is packaged unofficially just for your convinience and not supported by Debian, although it uses the debian-configuration by Guenther Geiger.
ahh, then I could use it directly to upload to Debian proper ? :) Did you do lintian checks etc or fixed pending bugs, I would be happy to give away packaging of some of my packages ....
Of course I would be really proud to maintain PD on Debian/Agnula, and that's meant honest.
For my package I didn't run any lintian checks, neither did I look at the pending bugs. I just copied over the debian-directory from pd-0.32 and made some minor arrangements, for example use dh_link to link /usr/lib/pd/doc/html to /usr/share/doc/pd/html and such. Also I did not follow debian-dev for about a year, so maybe there are some policy violations that I'm not aware of. And I didn't build correct source packages, *.dsc and *.changes yet, so for a NM-upload I would need to do some more work.
But if you want to give away PD packaging and maybe lead me a bit through the new-maintainer queue, I would be willing to maintain PD or just do some Non-Maintainer-Uploads of better checked PD packages than the current one.
ciao,