Thanks. Unfortunately still a crash, but now at a different place. I also confirmed that it still runs fine when libpd is compiled with -O3 aka make DEBUG=true.
#0 signal_cleanup [inlined] () at /Users/dano/src/pd/libpd/pure-data/src/d_ugen.c:364 #1 0x0000000100026680 in ugen_stop () at d_ugen.c:562 #2 0x000000010002670e in ugen_start () at d_ugen.c:569 #3 0x000000010003197e in glob_dsp (dummy=0x100102e00, s=0x0, argc=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, argv=0x100102e20) at g_canvas.c:1086 #4 0x000000010006d286 in pd_typedmess (x=0x1000a5760, s=0x0, argc=1055232, argv=0x100102e20) at m_class.c:699 #5 0x0000000100096fb8 in libpd_message [inlined] () at /Users/dano/src/pd/libpd/libpd_wrapper/z_libpd.c:236 #6 0x0000000100096fb8 in libpd_finish_message (recv=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, msg=0x100000f67 "dsp") at z_libpd.c:562 #7 0x0000000100000b8f in main ()
In detail:
#0 signal_cleanup [inlined] () at /Users/dano/src/pd/libpd/pure-data/src/d_ugen.c:364 364 pd_this->pd_signals = sig->s_nextused; (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x0000000100026680 in ugen_stop () at d_ugen.c:562 364 pd_this->pd_signals = sig->s_nextused; (gdb) frame 2 #2 0x000000010002670e in ugen_start () at d_ugen.c:569 569 ugen_stop(); (gdb) frame 3 #3 0x000000010003197e in glob_dsp (dummy=0x100102e00, s=0x0, argc=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, argv=0x100102e20) at g_canvas.c:1086 1086 ugen_start(); (gdb) frame 4 #4 0x000000010006d286 in pd_typedmess (x=0x1000a5760, s=0x0, argc=1055232, argv=0x100102e20) at m_class.c:699 699 else (*((t_messgimme)(m->me_fun)))(x, s, argc, argv); (gdb) frame 5 #5 0x0000000100096fb8 in libpd_message [inlined] () at /Users/dano/src/pd/libpd/libpd_wrapper/z_libpd.c:236 236 pd_typedmess(dest, gensym(msg), n, v); (gdb) frame 6 #6 0x0000000100096fb8 in libpd_finish_message (recv=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, msg=0x100000f67 "dsp") at z_libpd.c:562 236 pd_typedmess(dest, gensym(msg), n, v); (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000000100000b8f in main ()
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
On Apr 22, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
OK ... I think I fixed it... pull newest from git and try.
thanks M
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:35:10PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Aha - sometimes things crash on OSX because of "minor" buffer overruns that linux just soldiers past. I'll break out a mac and try again...
M
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:03:09AM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Weird. It crashes for me on OSX when libpd is built with -O3 and the program is built with or without -O3.
*Note: I just finished reorganizing the libpd samples by language name. If you do a pull, the multi instance test is now located in samples/c/pdtest_multi
Rebuilding and running it again yields:
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: 13 at address: 0x0000000000000000 outlet_float (x=0x3f7ffc2a3f7ffc38, f=0) at m_obj.c:388 388 for (oc = x->o_connections; oc; oc = oc->oc_next)
#0 outlet_float (x=0x3f7ffc2a3f7ffc38, f=0) at m_obj.c:388 #1 0x000000010006f0b9 in outlet_bang (x=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at m_obj.c:363 #2 0x00000001000953f9 in metro_tick (x=0x10021ad90) at x_time.c:162 #3 0x0000000100071010 in sched_tick () at m_sched.c:418 #4 0x0000000100096733 in libpd_process_float (ticks=1, inBuffer=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, outBuffer=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at z_libpd.c:185 #5 0x0000000100000d67 in main ()
some frame detail:
(gdb) frame 0 #0 outlet_float (x=0x3f7ffc2a3f7ffc38, f=0) at m_obj.c:388 388 for (oc = x->o_connections; oc; oc = oc->oc_next) (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x000000010006f0b9 in outlet_bang (x=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at m_obj.c:363 363 pd_bang(oc->oc_to); (gdb) frame 2 #2 0x00000001000953f9 in metro_tick (x=0x10021ad90) at x_time.c:162 162 outlet_bang(x->x_obj.ob_outlet); (gdb) frame 3 #3 0x0000000100071010 in sched_tick () at m_sched.c:418 418 (*c->c_fn)(c->c_owner); (gdb) frame 4 #4 0x0000000100096733 in libpd_process_float (ticks=1, inBuffer=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, outBuffer=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at z_libpd.c:185 185 PROCESS(,) (gdb) frame 5 #5 0x0000000100000d67 in main ()
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
On Apr 22, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
I think it was optimized since I had already made libpd, not from the sampes/.../multi directory. But anyhow I re-did it as you suggest with the same result.... can't make it fail...
cheers M
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:03:28AM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote:
You ran it without the optimizations since I added the debug option. Remove DEBUG=true from line 33 in the Makefile: https://github.com/libpd/libpd/blob/master/samples/c_samples/multi/Makefile#... https://github.com/libpd/libpd/blob/master/samples/c_samples/multi/Makefile#L33 and do a full clean before rebuilding:
cd ../../../ && make clobber && cd - && make
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
On Apr 21, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
Hi Dan et al -
I gave this a try:
git clone https://github.com/libpd/libpd.git
[copies pd sources into libpd/pure-data]
cd libpd make
cd samples/c_samples/multi/ make ./multi_pdtest multi_test.pd `pwd`
and got output:
print: 0 1003-frequency: bang print: 0 1004-frequency: bang 1003-frequency: 1 1004-frequency: 2 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 0.999999 0.999998 0.999998 0.999997 0.999997 1.000000 1.000000 0.999998 0.999998 0.999996 0.999996 0.999995 0.999995 print: 1 0.999944 0.999944 0.999943 0.999943 0.999942 0.999942 0.999941 0.999941 print: 1 0.999815 0.999815 0.999810 0.999810 0.999804 0.999804 0.999799 0.999799 print: 2 print: 2
This on Fedora 21, 64 bits, Intel hardware.
I guess something subtle is happening, maybe in Pd and unrelated to libpd?
cheers Miller
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:00:15PM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Howdy Miller, > > Following up from the dev list last year, I added your multi instance test to the c samples included with libpd: https://github.com/libpd/libpd/tree/master/samples/c_samples/multi https://github.com/libpd/libpd/tree/master/samples/c_samples/multi > > The one thing I want to double check is the changes to z_libpd.c you mentioned in http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019832.html: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019832.html: > >> Here's how I modified libpd_wrapper/z_libpd.c: >> >> 55d54 >> < sys_time = 0; >> 110c109 >> < sched_tick(sys_time + sys_time_per_dsp_tick); >> --- >>> >> sched_tick(); >> >> 130c129 >> < sched_tick(sys_time + sys_time_per_dsp_tick); \ >> --- >>> >> sched_tick(); \ > > > Currently, that line is https://github.com/libpd/libpd/blob/master/libpd_wrapper/z_libpd.c#L171 https://github.com/libpd/libpd/blob/master/libpd_wrapper/z_libpd.c#L171 and I’m getting a segfault if I replace it with sched_tick(); AND set gcc optimization to -O3 > > Here’s a gdb backtrace: > > #0 0x0000000100091f2f in outlet_float (x=0x3f7ffc2a3f7ffc38, f=0.999937057) at m_obj.c:388 > #1 0x00000001000ac572 in pdfloat_bang (x=0x10021ac20) at x_connective.c:89 > #2 0x0000000100093d58 in pd_bang (x=0x10021ac20) at m_pd.c:267 > #3 0x0000000100091ddd in outlet_bang (x=0x10021ae20) at m_obj.c:363 > #4 0x00000001000c45e4 in metro_tick (x=0x10021ada0) at x_time.c:162 > #5 0x0000000100095021 in sched_tick () at m_sched.c:418 > #6 0x00000001000c5d4d in libpd_process_float (ticks=1, inBuffer=0x7fff5fbffa50, outBuffer=0x7fff5fbff750) at z_libpd.c:173 > #7 0x0000000100000d18 in main () > > If I don’t optimize, it works fine: > > print: 0 > 1003-frequency: bang > print: 0 > 1004-frequency: bang > 1003-frequency: 1 > 1004-frequency: 2 > 1.000000 1.000000 0.999999 0.999999 0.999998 0.999998 0.999997 0.999997 > 1.000000 1.000000 0.999998 0.999998 0.999996 0.999996 0.999995 0.999995 > print: 1 > 0.999944 0.999944 0.999943 0.999943 0.999942 0.999942 0.999941 0.999941 > print: 1 > 0.999815 0.999815 0.999810 0.999810 0.999804 0.999804 0.999799 0.999799 > print: 2 > print: 2 > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ > robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/ >> On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Kjetil Matheussen k.s.matheussen@gmail.com wrote: >> >> But for libpd, are you sure you need to add anything? Can't just the user >> call the pdinstance_new and pd_setinstance functions directly? >> >> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019832.html http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019832.html >> >> >> (BTW. When I wrote about libpds, I hadn't forgotten about the support for pd instances, >> but since I didn't have all details in my head then, I didn't mention it. I should have though.) >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com> wrote: >> This should be possible with the current version of libpd which includes Miller’s multiple instance updates, see http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019839.html http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-05/019839.html >> >> I just haven’t gotten around to adding libpd-specific wrapper functions for this yet, but Miller provides code in that dev list exchange. >> >> -------- >> Dan Wilcox >> @danomatika >> danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ >> robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/ >>> On Apr 21, 2015, at 6:00 AM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote: >>> >>> From: Oliver Greschke <info@o-g-sus.de mailto:info@o-g-sus.de> >>> Subject: [PD-dev] Can somebody help to create a desktop / VST / AU version of a PD / libPD / app ? >>> Date: April 21, 2015 at 3:15:44 AM EDT >>> To: pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> I am the creator of the Elastic Drums iOS app (with great PD help from Matt Davey). >>> It’s made with PureData, libPD and Objective-C. >>> I got asked a couple of times now, if there will be ever a standalone desktop version or even better Plugin (VST, AU) version of the app. >>> >>> As far as I know, there are not ready to use workarounds to do so. Which is sad, because I can imagine a lot of fantastic plugins emerging from PD >>> >>> Has somebody here some experience with doing such ports? >>> Then please contact me. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Oliver >>> >>> info@o-g-sus.de mailto:info@o-g-sus.de >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-dev mailing list >> Pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:Pd-dev@lists.iem.at >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >> >> >
> _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > Pd-dev@lists.iem.at > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev