26 Mar
2005
26 Mar
'05
1:21 p.m.
this is not just a minor implementation detail. You are
for reusability of abstractions. I admit, that I don't really know
same, not exactly sure what this change means , or if breakage was ever proposed...however matju's other proposals sound nice, as if they would solve the problem of using too many symbols at the source:
* to use multielement lists of varying/unknown length as 'atoms' (currently via l2s/s2l symbol hack) * as 'string'-esque buffers between object
whatever u do, im sure you wont break the 'rradical' communication paradigm ...i'm using the same scheme for my OSC sequencer and sure hope it deosnt break any time soon!...