On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Plans Casal David wrote:
Separation of Concerns: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns Separation of language, content, and presentation has to be a good move, no?
but the IEMGUIs, like the rest of the Pd GUIs, are part of the language. You can't remove them without breaking the code.
I have a working version of Pd with the iemguis as externals, so I don't see the "breaking the code" part,
That's not relevant, because we're talking about what it means to separate concerns. I'm trying to make a point about what it means to separate presentation, and how it is that separating IEMGUI does not constitute separating presentation, and I use the removal of IEMGUI as an example, and then you come in and say that you are not removing IEMGUI. What are you talking about? What am *I* talking about?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada