Ah, sorry, I didn't know that you were already in contact with them, I'm not very current on all of the various subprojects. If you are already in contact with them, then you clearly did not violate the rules :-D
.hc
On 09/24/2012 08:28 AM, Antoine Villeret wrote:
Hi Hans,
I'm very surprised about your reaction. I started working on pix_opencv two years ago, the first external I made [pix_opencv_calibration] had been committed by Lluis himself. Concerning Yves, he manages pdp_opnecv, not pix_opencv, and about Sergi I never saw this name in any of the pix_opencv files... After that, I made new ones and Llius didn't have time to commit and maintain the new ones, so he said in a mail on On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 : " for new objects on pix_opencv/ you can commit by your self if you want, ok?" (he was replying both to Cyrille and me). I took this as commit permission for Cyrille and me, but maybe I misunderstood. At this time, I did't have commit access to pure-data repository, so Cyrille committed new objects for me without any troubles I think. So did i last saturday. Moreover, I understood in one of your mail that you prefer I commit in an existing repository than creating a new one, this is what i've done. Maybe I misunderstood one more time. We do NOT change any of the externals already in the repository, we just add new ones and change the help files to make them following the Gem help file template. If you still think that I'm violating rules, so you can revert all my commits, and you can delete me from the committers list to avoid any further problems. I'm using those externals every days, if i have to keep them for me, I will not be disturbed, but I think it's a shame.
a.