30 Mar
2022
30 Mar
'22
5:44 p.m.
On 30.03.2022 17:40, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 3/30/22 17:21, Christof Ressi wrote:
but i don't really see how it would help with fat binaries.
Two solutions that come to my mind:
- just use an ugly folder name:
foo.pd/darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32/foo.dylib
the problem with this is, that it is not well-defined.
currently we calculate a few variants of possible names based on a reference string ("darwin-arm64-32") and try to open files according to these names.
but we cannot possible foresee all the possible variants; even if we limit ourselves to 4 architectures, we get about 40 possible variants (for any 1 architecture)
I see. What about the second idea?
- use a special specifier for universal binaries:
foo.pd/darwin-universal-32/foo.dylib