Cool - this would be a good conference paper somewhere, maybe LAC... But maybe it would be easier for you if I simply ask you specific qestions when I don't understand something in the diffs...
Not sure when I'll realy get to work on this - I'm also hoping to put in a proper multiple-undo facility (borrowing from Ico) and am toying with the idea of making it easier to bundle patches and their support files together somehow (so that you can distribute a patch that would have its own abstractions/samples/whatever bundled in).
cheers Miller
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:11:10AM +0100, katja wrote:
Miller, I still have 100+ pages of (handwritten, Dutch) notes on Pd-double. If you're serious about making precision-related modifications to vanilla Pd I'll start re-reading these notes because it's a while ago and not all issues were trivial or self-evident. The page www.katjaas.nl/doubleprecision/doubleprecision.html doesn't document the implementation details.
Katja
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
The diffs are helpful - I would probably want to go and re-do all the edits by hand to be sure I understand everything. A couple of things probably will need tweaking to get it all up to date too.
...
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev