oliver wrote:
again a suggestion from my side about this issue:
why not use a message like "setname" to change send's adress (instead of "set") ?
and why not use a second inlet that is bound to "" ? that's how i handle inlets that shouldn't be settable via the first inlet. (of course any not so simple to make symbol would do, like "\n\n\t"
mfg.as.rd IOhannes
that would cause a lot less trouble ...
oliver