On Jul 9, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:33:56PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
Sounds good! I will stop pestering the list about it then and wait until after pd~convention to commit s-abstractions when there is some resolution about the repository.
It doesn't take much to commit stuff to the CVS. I'd say it wouldn't hurt to do it now.
Well as it stands now I'd have the annoying requirement that I keep two local copies of s-abstractions and have to manually port changes between them and commit to two different repositories, which was the reason for my original post. I am very forgetful, and I am certain that the SF repository would fall out of date as I'd forget to commit to that repository each time I made a change.
I'm happy to wait until we've resolved the repository issues before importing my abstractions.
If you are going to maintain your code in a repository that is different from the pure-data one, then it makes the most sense to only import releases into the pure-data CVS, instead of keeping it synced. "cvs import" allows you to do this with one command that also makes a tag for that release.
.hc
Best,
Chris.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
"...information-sharing is a powerful positive good, and... it is an ethical duty of hackers to share their expertise by writing open- source code and facilitating access to information and to computing resources wherever possible." - Eric Raymond