Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
and since there are some parallels between message-$-args and object-$-args, having a "$@" would also mean that you could have argument-lists of arbitrary length in abstractions in abstractions. [l $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] is not the same as [l $@].
Now *THAT* would be mighty cool. I'm quite fond of IEM's [dollarg] already.
Ciao