18 Feb
2009
18 Feb
'09
9:38 a.m.
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 17/02/2009, at 10.12, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i still think that the loading-order in 0.42 is broken by design.
Could you elaborate this a bit? Or point me to the relevant archive post? How is the loading order in 0.42?
I'm guessing he means that the internals are loaded first, then the libs (in any meaning Pd-wise). And not the other way around: Libs first, then the internals.
i meant that i think that i think that automatic overwriting of classes is broken design. i haven't read-on in this thread when i wrote the original email; if so, i would have felt no need to type.
fdga IOhannes