Hallo, guenter geiger hat gesagt: // guenter geiger wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I still vote for "main" in whatever combination with numbers and unspeakable letters...
I think calling a branch "main.." might lead to confusion with the main trunk. Thats why I would call it the "stable.." branch.
I don't stick to "main", "msp" would also be okay, although "main" is more appropriate IMO. But I have a slight problem with "stable". "stable" should only be used after a release. Similar to the way, Debian handles the name "stable", for *the* version to rely on, if you need reliability.
I actually like what Hans proposed in his "best practice" mail: Have "release_x" branches, and release candidates branches (which is the state, 0.38 is currently in).
Ciao