Re: [PD-dev] call for discussion double-precision file extension

On 3/29/22 20:03, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:

Joining the discussion:

I think the "deken-specifier" is Ok.

here's something i just came up with: what would the deken-specifier be for fat-binaries (on macOS).

i do not want to have zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so (the reason is practicability: Pd constructs the filename beforehand, and then tries to open the file. but in this example, we do not really know whether the filename is "zexy.darwin-amd64-32.darwin-arm64-32.so" or "zexy.darwin-arm64-32.darwin-amd64-32.so" or "zexy.darwin-arm64-32.darwin-ppc-32.darwin-amd64-32.so")

we obviously could ditch fat binaries in this case altogether (not sure whether this is a good idea though).

gfmas IOhannes