18 Dec
2007
18 Dec
'07
3:21 p.m.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
the main counter-argument against svn was, that everything that cannot be done with CVS was considered as "experimental" and "should not be used", in which case i don't see a reason to do the work.
Really? If you don't mind me asking, which features are the ones in question? Also, it's not just about things that aren't possible, it's also about certain things that are just plain far better in svn than cvs ...
-- Russell Bryant