Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
- developer vote:
Should the SF repository switch from CVS to SVN on Sourceforge? [ ] yes [ ] no
i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of acl for svn? or can we live without acl's?
- sort out techical issues with branches, tags etc.
for externals i would suggest to split branches on each external separately, (e.g. /externals/zexy/trunk instead of /trunk/externals/zexy or /externals/trunk/zexy) (the repository basically consists of a lot of small packages which all have their independent release cycles)
for pd/pd-devel i suggest 2 main branches in parallel (e.g. /pd/trunk/ and /pd/devel/ instead of /pd/branches/devel
- find someone (incl. admins!) who volunteers to do the import. I
would volunteer but I wouldn't want to do this completely alone.
i would volunteer too, however i don't see any advantage in having 2 (or more) persons involved in the migration. (probably when they are at the same terminal, like with XP, then there might be a benefit)
mfg.adsr- .IOhannes
agree on date
do it.
Ciao