On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey,
hi
Luckily, CVS is designed to do this:
"13. Tracking third-party sources" http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.12.9/cvs_13.html
;-) my only comment on this is that i won't comment it.
I am not particular about the name of the section, I am thinking "win32_sources". Comments, feedback, etc.?
so what happens if (after some time) you notice that other OS's will profit from the packages in win32_sources too? will the package "foobar" live in both "win32_sources" and "linux64_sources"? or will the linux-stuff also live in "win32_sources"?
i'd rather vote for "3rdparty" or something along these lines.
I am fine with a different name.
But I have to say, I think we should try to avoid using these sources for anything else but Win32. Right now, the policy with the auto- build farms is that the deps need to be in that platform's package management. MinGW has no package management beyond the basic tools, hence this repository.
.hc
mfg.asdr IOhannes
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic