18 Feb
2010
18 Feb
'10
7:59 p.m.
ben wrote:
... So that worked for getting the proper value, but the method I was using to get the second argument (argv+1) no longer works. Presumably because the "next" location is no longer the same. ...
Do you mean after you copied the data? Did you try either
threadargs->argv[1]
or
*(threadargs->argv+1)
? They should both give the value of the second argument.
Martin