Sure, I could have addressed that it may be 'too late' and I see it, but I guess I got hopeful with Miller saying "there is still lots to do", and I hope we could squeeze some more features in for the next tests and final releases.
I think I got a little spoiled that the last Pd releases have been filled with many amazing new goodies and I feel this one could have a tad bit more to keep things up :) but I can also see that sometimes we just have to wrap things up with what's there and call it an update... just cause it's time for an update...
cheers
Em sex., 10 de mai. de 2024 às 09:35, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at escreveu:
On 5/10/24 02:43, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em ter., 7 de mai. de 2024 às 14:59, Benjamin Wesch < benjamin.wesch@gmail.com> escreveu:
adding signal comparison/logical operators
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2054 seems like a very good feature addition
- 1 for these objects in vanilla
maybe i missed why including them could be controversial - but to me, they seem like a natural part of the vanilla feature set and a valuable addition.
There wasn't (at least up to now) any remark on why this could be 'controversial', and I can't see any 'controversy' either. Well, maybe th
as this has been dangling for a few days, i would like to comment.
- i don't think there is much controversy about the suggested feature.
- the proposed change is a *new feature*
- from a release perspective, it might already be too late to add new
features for 0.55.0 (somebody mentioned "last minute changes"; which *i* would not be the place for new features).
i am of course not the release manager of Pd, and do not decide what gets in and what not. i wrote this only to express that the non-inclusion of the desired feature might be simply a matter of unfortunate timing.
mdsr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev