20 Oct
2012
20 Oct
'12
10:07 a.m.
On 10/20/2012 01:26 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not going to take on the maintenance of those patches, so just copying them into Pd-extended is not an option. I'm think Pd-extended should have an 'oscx' compatible library , and 'oscx' is already there, tested, etc.
"etc" means "known to be buggy & unmaintained".
i'm not arguing against OSCx because of it's architectural flaws but because it's not working as it should.
mfgdsrt IOhannes