11 May
2006
11 May
'06
8:19 a.m.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
You will have to be careful about nameclashes. You may also find that several of your externals already have an equivalent under another name in Pd.
Nameclashes aren't such an issue with namespaces/Pd-extended. But yes,
i think matju did not mean _these_ nameclashes (correct me if i'm wrong), but rather _those_ where a max object and a pd object share the name but not the functionality. which would give you a false sense of security of a successfull patch-conversion.
its good to avoid needless nameclashes.
it's also good to avoid necessary nameclashes.
mfg.vser. IOhannes