On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Mysth-R wrote:
2008/3/11, Peter Brinkmann peter.brinkmann@googlemail.com:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Hey,
What happens if you just change it so that the x86 target works for both? It seems that the code in the if statements is the same. E.g., change this:
*86-*-linux*)to this:
*86*-linux*)Then that should work for both x86 and x86_64.
Actually, the code for the targets is not quite the same; I had to add -fPIC to the compiler options to get it to compile on my 64-bit machine. Peter
Yes I also had to add -fPIC to the compiler option.
I am guessing there is probably no harm in adding -fPIC to the 32-bit builds. I know that on Mac OS X, the whole package is compiled with - fPIC. I checked in a fix, please try it on 64-bit to make sure it works there (the nightlies will tell me about 32-bit :)
.hc
On Mar 11, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Peter Brinkmann wrote:
Hi all, I recently managed to compile OSCx on my 64-bit machine (FC6 with Planet CCRMA) by adding the appropriate compiler options to configure.ac. I'll attach the modified file.
By the way, I'm about to embark on a project that'll probably involve PD and OSC. I'm getting the impression that I should use mrpeach's net/osc objects rather than OSCx. Is that right? Best, Peter
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
If you get this working it would be great if you can submit a patch to the tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736&atid=478072
Or at the very least a bug report:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=55736&atid=478072
.hc
On Mar 9, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Mysth-R wrote:
2008/3/9, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at: hi
Mysth-R wrote:
Hi, I've got some difficulties trying to compile pd-extended on my
64 bits
gentoo. I have downloaded latest pd from the svn and use the latest pd
official
release (0.41-2 https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/trunk
here is my error message :
[...]
make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire « /home/mysthr2/logiciels/musique/pure-data/externals/OSCx/src »
cc -Wl,-export_dynamic -shared -o sendOSC.pd_linux sendOSC.o
htmsocket.o
OSC-system-dependent.o -L../../../pd/bin -lpd -lc -lm ../libOSC/
libOSC.a
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-
linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find -lpd
for whatever reasons you are trying to link against libpd which does not exist.
Well, I don't know, I have just downloaded pd-extended from svn...
try removing the "-lpd" from the makefile.
yes thank you it works.
Does Pd-extended is compatible with 64 bits arch ? Do I missed something ?
i don't know, but this is not the problem here....
btw, i would suggest to remove OSCx from pd-extended and replace it by some abstractions based on osc/net (i have them lying around somewhere)
Ok but at this moment I have some patch working with OSCx so, I would like to make it work. But yes perhaps I should use another one.
Thank you for the help :)
--
- {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
- <= Aide Auditive =>
- http://myspace.com/mysthr
- http://myspace.com/aideauditive
- http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié ŕ l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
ˇEl pueblo unido jamás será vencido!
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
<configure.ac> _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
--
- {^_^} Mysth-R {^_^}
- <= Aide Auditive =>
- http://myspace.com/mysthr
- http://myspace.com/aideauditive
- http://mysthr.free.fr/Joomla => Site dédié à l'audio sous
Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
"[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from scarcity." -John Gilmore