On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
I believe I tried to apply a patch that added the 'altname' business, which then caused some problems, so I rewrote the code to do the same thing better without the extra parameter. I think the string passed in devel_0_39 is simply passed as "classname" in 0.40. For instance, if someone asks for "doo/dah" in devel_0_39 you get "dah" for classname and "doo/dah" for altname; in 0.40 classname is "doo/dah".
how well does that handle a class called [/], such as the one used for division? can that one be namespaced like others?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada