Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
(but you are patching the pd file, which works ;-))
I wonder, if "patching" works on CVS... I have found, that real merging on CVS not even seems to work correctly for Makefiles: I often get these ">>>>>" lines in Makefiles from Pd-CVS, for which I made local changes, when I "cvs update"
- create a pd-file
- make a backup-copy
- change the original pd-file
- commit it to the svn/cvs
- replace the (changed) original file with the backup.
- change the backup copy
- update from the cvs
this should produce a merge.
Okay, I see the difference. I suppose this would be hard to deal with for every versioning software that tries to merge Pd patches. Probably only Pd can be used to do this with copy/paste.
Ciao