Hallo, Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
What about a SVN at goto10.org ?
We at goto10 discussed this internally some time ago, but decided at that time that for such a big project as the Pd-CVS we lack the (human and technical) resources to support it as it would deserve.
Well it seems to me that there are three tasks that we need to accomplish here:
- Transitioning to a more feature rich source management system.
Which veryvery likely will be Svn.
- Moving the repository to a more reliable machine that we have control
over.
Matju pointed out, Sourceforge became quite reliable, it's just not as flexible in regard to user/access management.
- Sorting out the structure of the repository.
Um, yes. ;)
I think that we could do them in any order, but for selfish reasons i'd like to prioritise 1, and suggest SVN, since it will make my own task of including s-abstractions in pd-extended much easier.
Maybe it would be a good idea to try to organize a repository management workshop or panel or so during the pd~convention. I guess, most people involved in the repository will be there and it may be easier to deal with these issues face to face.
Ciao