On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
> Hans wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>> Back when I was on the pd-cvs mailing-list, I'd have said that
>>> it's a good idea. I don't know how much pd-cvs has changed since.
>>> Well, of course it should be made in a way that won't flood the
>>> channel (e.g. sending one message per file changed would be a very
>>> bad idea, especially in project made of many many many small files).
>>
>> About flooding the room with messages, there aren't that many
>> commits, a few a day is a lot for this project, so I don't think
>> that's a big concern.
>
> I said it specifically because there is a tendency in CVS to handle
> each folder separately even when doing only one commit. So if you
> make a commit in 20 folders at once it could appear as 20 commits.
> Anyway. Let's try it. But then we'd have to compensate for those who
> are too shy to commit something because of the fear that it might
> "interrupt" someone else's conversation... ;)
>
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
Ok, I set up CIA.vc to post commit messages to #dataflow. Let me know
if it bothers anyone and I can remove it.
.hv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic