Pd-dev October 2003

pd-dev@lists.iem.at

30 participants
41 discussions

Pdplay?
by Nicola Bernardini 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, at the SOb project (http://www.soundobject.org) we're writing some really cool physical model objects which we are soon going to package and propose to the pure-data externals repository (they are GNU/GPL). However, we now have a problem that we want to solve soon: we need standalone versions of some demo applications (possibly running griPD etc.) we did. It would be nice to have a sort of MaxPlay type of thing (how about PdPlay?). I have some ideas on how to do it and it could be trivial, and therefore it is very probable that someone has already done it somewhere. If no one has done it, I'll hack up one solution and report back to the list as soon as it is done (it is going to be GNU/GPL anyway :). Thank you in advance for all the help you will want to give. nicb +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Nicola Bernardini | |E-mail: nicb(a)centrotemporeale.it | |GPG Fingerprint = 6AE6 AF21 E160 D9B3 396E EBAC 906C CFAE 4D65 D910| |Neither MS-Word nor MS-PowerPoint attachments please: | |http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE9mf2qkGzPrk1l2RARAqi/AJ92NXY9HoDWlMbRcu59RkUQNH8E7gCeLU07 +ocbGJWYRzzrrdQO/cG0BcM= =TT6i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 7

pd-cvs list
by Johannes M Zmoelnig 01 Dec '03

01 Dec '03

is it really necessary that all the changes are posted to the pd-cvs ? i would find comments only a bit more interesting (i would check out the new files instead of patching my local copies) mfg.asd.rw IOhannes

3 2

pb with tcl/tk
by clubint/totoetlititi 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Sorry, I 'm just seing I have forget the subject...!... I have try rpm -i --nodeps pd-xxx.rpm.... and it's work !!! thanks !!!

1 0

Re: Re: [PD-dev] (no subject)
by totoetlititi＠club-internet.fr 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Thanks, but I don't want compile PD !!!! I don't understand why PD should use the development's lib of tcl/tk ... I want just use the binairy... snifff...! I have these files: libtcl.so and libtk.so in /usr/local/lib I make symlinks to /usr/local/lib/libtcl.so.0 and /usr/local/lib/libtk.so.0... but I have again this problem... Perhaps should I put these symlinks in /usr/lib ? no ? If do you use Linux, where are these library ? Pleaaaaase..... !!!! Tom ----Message d'origine---- >Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:02:23 -0800 (PST) >De: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans(a)eds.org> >A: marius schebella <marius.schebella(a)chello.at> >Copie à: totoetlititi(a)club-internet.fr, pd-dev(a)iem.at >Sujet: Re: [PD-dev] (no subject) > > >I think you only need the -dev packages if you are going to compile >Pd. The regular packages should include the libs. But I am speaking >from a Debian perspective. > >My guess is that RedHat and Mandrake might have different standards for >naming/symlinking their libs. I know RedHat and Debian differ, causing >problems in the past. > >..hc > >On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, marius schebella wrote: > >> Hi, >> do you also have the developement part of tcl/tk? I think you also need >> tcl8.x-dev and/or tk8.x-dev. >> Marius. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <totoetlititi(a)club-internet.fr> >> To: <pd-dev(a)iem.at> >> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:33 PM >> Subject: [PD-dev] (no subject) >> >> >> Hello ! >> >> I try to install the newet version of PD >> (http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software/pd-0.37-0.i386.rpm) on Mandrake, >> but I have little problem...! >> I try "rpm -i pd-0.37-0.i386.rpm", and I have this error: libtcl.so.0 and >> libtk.so.0 are needed, but didn't found.... >> I have downloaded and installed the newest version of the lib tcl/tk, but I >> have always this error... >> Why ? >> Where want PD find this libraries ? >> >> Thanks ! >> >> Thomas >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-dev mailing list >> PD-dev(a)iem.at >> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PD-dev mailing list >> PD-dev(a)iem.at >> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev >> > > zen > \ > \ > \[D[D[D[D > >

1 0

(no subject)
by totoetlititi＠club-internet.fr 30 Oct '03

30 Oct '03

Hello ! I try to install the newet version of PD (http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software/pd-0.37-0.i386.rpm) on Mandrake, but I have little problem...! I try "rpm -i pd-0.37-0.i386.rpm", and I have this error: libtcl.so.0 and libtk.so.0 are needed, but didn't found.... I have downloaded and installed the newest version of the lib tcl/tk, but I have always this error... Why ? Where want PD find this libraries ? Thanks ! Thomas

4 3

64 bit issues
by guenter geiger 30 Oct '03

30 Oct '03

Hi, I have just tested pd on my old Alpha, and realized that there are some issues with 64 bit pointers that keep pd from working on that platform: The pointer values that are used for tagging tcl/tk objects in pd are 64 bit on alpha (and of course on the new intel and athlon machines). Pd uses the "%x" format to send these values. What happens is that "%x" cuts off a part of the 64 bit pointers, which normally does not matter, but obviously it only cuts them off in some situations but in others not. Therefor the GUI is not functional in the current release. I have been able to overcome this problem by using the "%lx" format. (which corresponds to "long integer", the type that should be able to hold a pointer on all architectures I have seen so far). I can come up with a patch for that (simple query/replace of %x) if you are interested. Guenter

1 0

Debugging PD
by Luke Yelavich 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

I wrote: >How can one get a backtrace of PD if for example, you get a segfault? I >was thinking of gdb, but not sure exactly what to do, as I don't know >whether PD runs in several threads, etc. > >The problem is using PD with Jack, and using the -audiodev command and >entering more than one audio device, eg 1,2. With 1 only, PD stays >running, but with more than 1, it segfaults shortly after startup. Turns out this is proper behavior. With Jack, there is no real number of audio devices. Using the -inchannels and -outchannels arguments got what I wanted. Luke ---------------- Luke Yelavich AudioSlack Founder and main package maintainer Audio software packaged for the Slackware Linux Distribution http://www.audioslack.com luke(a)audioslack.com

2 1

Debugging PD
by Luke Yelavich 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

Hi all How can one get a backtrace of PD if for example, you get a segfault? I was thinking of gdb, but not sure exactly what to do, as I don't know whether PD runs in several threads, etc. The problem is using PD with Jack, and using the -audiodev command and entering more than one audio device, eg 1,2. With 1 only, PD stays running, but with more than 1, it segfaults shortly after startup. Thanks in advance. Luke ---------------- Luke Yelavich AudioSlack Founder and main package maintainer Audio software packaged for the Slackware Linux Distribution http://www.audioslack.com luke(a)audioslack.com

1 0

[PD] Mac OS X installers - BUG
by B. Bogart 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

Hey Hans, I downloaded the current macOSX installer from your pure-data site. I think this might have already been reported but PD does not get installed correctly if you specifiy a non-root folder for the installation. Probably makes sense to #1 set the installation target in the package so that the user cannot change it or #2 (longer term) make the PD system relative so that it can be installed in any place (like all of it in applications). I think Matt is working on this? Also for the Windows installer the "abstactions" folder that is created is not added to the path for the PD batch file. Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans(a)eds.org> To: "roc" <principio(a)ilimit.es> Cc: <pd-list(a)iem.at> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [PD] PD Mac OS X installers It gives you a working Pd install with lots of externals. But of course it has its problems, as all Pd installs do. I now exclusively use the installers when I am using Pd. Its just so much easier than compiling everything yourself. But actually, you can compile the package yourself quite easily. Just check everything out and in packages/darwin_pkg, type "make darwin_pkg". If you do use the installer and find problems, please report them to the pd-dev list. .hc On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 06:25 America/New_York, roc wrote: > this may be a silly question, but i been somehow out of the world > recently > is the installer for os x 0.37 ready and totally ok finally? > ; >-) > > r > -------------------- > %evol--------http://www.mego.at/evol.html > %alku--------http://personal.ilimit.es/principio > %imbécil----http://imbecil.net ________________________________________________________________________ ____ There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste _______________________________________________ PD-list mailing list PD-list(a)iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list

2 1

about the cvs branches
by Marc Lavallée 26 Oct '03

26 Oct '03

Which cvs branch holds the latest 0.37 development? MAIN devel_0_37 version_0_37 source_dist source-dist miller ?? -- Marc

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pd-dev October 2003