On 10/06/2007, at 21.05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
furthermore i am thinking about setting adding the plone-software- center to the puredata.info page, which is a system for releasing files, bugtracking and documenting software.
I'm not 100% sure how this software work, but having such features for different members small to big puredata projects sounds nice. However, 1) how does it differ from the current settings if it had a bugtracker? 2) not all use the puredata.info site for sharing there work, but rather their own system somewhere, hence i fear you'd labor for wee bonus. But if you'd need it for the Gem stuff, then it'll of cause be in use and worth the effort.
the good thing about it is, that it can incorporate external sources as well (e.g. use the sf-tracker as an issue tracker)
That i don't understand.
[...] but unfortunately(?) it suggests an organization as i like it (organized per "package") and not as hans would prefer (organized site-wide)
what do you think?
I guess it depends how one search for things. Or how much collaboration there is. Or what contents is dominant. I favor consistency over any specific solution. - But your "smartfolder" suggestion in the previous email suggested that an "either-or"- solution wasn't necessary?
my humble void.