Pdweb

pdweb@lists.iem.at

208 discussions

pdweb missing on community/lists/
by Steffen 13 Dec '06

13 Dec '06

I think it would be nice if Pdweb was added to the list of maillists on http://puredata.info/community/lists/. (I don't have write access.)

3 4

how to register for puredata.info
by marius schebella 11 Dec '06

11 Dec '06

Hi, I can't find the registration page, I'missing something like. If you do not have an account here, head over to the registration form. marius.

2 1

decisions
by Steffen 11 Dec '06

11 Dec '06

I just wunder how decisions regarding the website (puredata.info) are made? Best, Steffen

3 5

pd blog
by Hans-Christoph Steiner 04 Dec '06

04 Dec '06

I was thinking that an easy way to have art works featured on puredata.org would be to turn the front page into a blog where anyone can post. Then have people post images, etc of their works. That shouldn't be too hard to implement in Plone, right? .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic

3 6

puredata.info/.org
by Adrian 25 Nov '06

25 Nov '06

this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is. a thread in the pd-list maillist is talking about the pr & marketing of pure data to the public. the very hot topics so far are a the puredata website and the pros & contras of maillist and forum. a redesign of the webpage would do a very good job in making pd interesting for other people. right now it's to technical and a maze, at least in my humble opinion. and i still want to state that a good fanbase is the best way to develop a product. more users = more interest = more programers = better stuff for everyone. just have a look at processing.org. the program itself is not that overwhelming. is it an easier access to java programing with a graphical aproach. but what they did out of it is amazing. a huge fanbase with so many good libaries to take on. are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net to see what is possible) because changing from plone to something else is not an option i think. to much work. to much lose. -- another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds

5 6

DNS down?
by Mathieu Bouchard 18 Nov '06

18 Nov '06

is the DNS down for puredata.info ? _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada

2 2

trimming functionality for usability
by Hans-Christoph Steiner 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Since we are on the topic, I thought I'd go further into it while I am reminded of some things. Basically, it seems that puredata.org site has everything turned on. That was good for experimenting, but now I think we need to narrow down the website. For example, I don't think its good to have so many syntax possibilities. That means if someone wants to maintain the site, they have to know them all. That's a pain. I think that StructuredText is bad enough, but then I run into reStructuredText sites. Plus there are HTML sites too, and there are other options available. I think we should just decide on two: HTML, since its widely understood, and one wiki syntax. Personally I am a big advocate of MediaWiki syntax. Its broadly understood and quite easy and flexible to use. MoinMoin syntax looks somewhat close to MediaWiki, and its written in Python. Another thing, I think no one uses "article" and "topic", so they should be removed. Basically, the page types list should be stripped down to a well defined set, as simple as possible, but no simpler. These specifics might not be the biggest problem, but I think that's the general idea of what needs to happen to make the site work better. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. - General Smedley Butler

3 3

Re: [Pdweb] puredata.info/.org
by Hans-Christoph Steiner 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

FYI: I am not IOhannes, who goes by Hannes in meatspace. I am just Hans, or Hans-Christoph Steiner in the digital world. IOhannes lives in Graz, and I in Brooklyn, New York. I cc'ed the pdweb list because I don't know the answer to your question. IOhannes probably does, and he reads that list. .hc On Oct 24, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Adrian wrote: > IOhannes: is it necessary to know zope/bash in order to rearange > plone? > I don't think we talk about groundshaking changes. More about > rearanging the modules on top of plone. > > On 10/24/06, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans(a)eds.org> wrote: >> >> There is also a dormant wiki page for the website, if you are looking >> for a place to take notes. >> >> http://puredata.org/dev/pd_webwiki >> >> Its great that you are taking this on! >> >> .hc >> >> On Oct 21, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Adrian wrote: >> >> > this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is. >> > >> > a thread in the pd-list maillist is talking about the pr & >> marketing >> > of pure data to the public. >> > the very hot topics so far are a the puredata website and the >> pros & >> > contras of maillist and forum. >> > >> > a redesign of the webpage would do a very good job in making pd >> > interesting for other people. >> > right now it's to technical and a maze, at least in my humble >> opinion. >> > and i still want to state that a good fanbase is the best way to >> > develop a product. more users = more interest = more programers = >> > better stuff for everyone. >> > >> > just have a look at processing.org. the program itself is not that >> > overwhelming. is it an easier access to java programing with a >> > graphical aproach. but what they did out of it is amazing. a huge >> > fanbase with so many good libaries to take on. >> > >> > are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net >> to see >> > what is possible) because changing from plone to something else >> is not >> > an option i think. to much work. to much lose. >> > >> > -- >> > another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > pdweb mailing list >> > pdweb(a)iem.at >> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> http://at.or.at/hans/ >> >> >> > > > -- > another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson

5 8

Re: [Pdweb] puredata.info/.org
by Kyle Klipowicz 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Here is a list of sites that use Plone. http://plone.org/about/sites/ I was really surprised and pleased by the Creative Commons page: http://creativecommons.org/ ~Kyle On 10/23/06, Adrian <nordbaer(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > ;) Good. Who was the guy who overed a graphical skin for plone? Not > the implementation, only a layout. There are good tutorials on the > plone site, and plone.net is a realy nice site which shows what is > possible with plone skinning. > > I'm happy that i found at least some people who share the same opinion > as i do :D > > On 10/23/06, Kyle Klipowicz <kyleklip(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Just wanted to shout out: > > I'm on this list now too, although I know NOTHING about plone! > > > > ~Kyle > > > > > > On 10/21/06, Steffen < stffn(a)dibidut.dk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 21/10/2006, at 22.28, Adrian wrote: > > > > > > > this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is. > > > > > > check. > > > > > > > are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net to > see > > > > what is possible) because changing from plone to something else is > not > > > > an option i think. to much work. to much lose. > > > > > > i think grafical changes are a good start. But i also think that > > > structural changes and silk documentation are important to get the > > > best out of it. > > > > > > I am, when i get some time, going to make a proposal. But there have, > > > in my opinion already been made good suggestions. fx: > > > > > > Kyle wrote: > > > > I really do enjoy the layout on the Processing site (http:// > > > > processing.org/), since it is very clean and has lots of pictures > > > > and a big fat examples section on the front page. If we are trying > > > > to market Pd to new users, this is THE most important thing (as > > > > previously asserted). > > > > > > > > I also enjoy their utilization of subdomains. We could do this > > > > with things like http://gem.puredata.org, http:// > > > > gridflow.puredata.org , http://pidip.puredata.org , etc. > > > > > > > > Also, it would be best if the forum was attached to the main > > > > website by at least a prominent link/redirect, if not actually in > > > > server space. But we definitely need more pictures: unless you're > > > > trying to show off by running lynx, the internet is not a purely > > > > textual medium. Besides, the people who actually DO patch Pd > > > > without a GUI probably aren't so interested in visiting a more > > > > marketing-oriented site anyway. Maybe we could do http:// > > > > nogui.puredata.org? > > > > > > Pete wote: > > > > * What it is, in simple terminology > > > > * What people are doing with it > > > > * How to install it - where to find different versions, and a sub- > > > > page with 'common problems' that people have when installing > > > > * Some simple tutorials with patches (the first howto on the > > > > current page is Miller's book!) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > pdweb mailing list > > > pdweb(a)iem.at > > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://theradioproject.com > > http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com > > > > (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) > > (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) > > ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ > > _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ > > ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO > > > -- > another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds > -- http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO

1 0

please put the dev docs back
by Hans-Christoph Steiner 29 Sep '06

29 Sep '06

I just noticed that the developer docs on puredata.org were moved to the "developer" section. Please put them back where they were, that is where they belong. The "developer" section is not for documentation, the documentation section is. That has been long since established. Also, there are many, many links out there that point to the old location for the developer docs. Lastly, please consult this list before making such drastic changes to the website. I've put a lot of work into that section, so you could have at least asked. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!

4 13

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Pdweb