For nightly builds, I'm thinking of scripting it to post the packages to apt.puredata.info/autobuild, unless there is any objections. For backwards compatibility with the old setup, it would be nice to have the old domain name, autobuild.puredata.info, point to apt.puredata.info. No other translation should be necessary.
.hc
sounds good.
-- Marco Donnarumma New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director. Embodied Audio-Visual Interaction Research Team. Department of Computing, Goldsmiths University of London ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.atwrote:
For nightly builds, I'm thinking of scripting it to post the packages to apt.puredata.info/autobuild, unless there is any objections. For backwards compatibility with the old setup, it would be nice to have the old domain name, autobuild.puredata.info, point to apt.puredata.info. No other translation should be necessary.
.hc _______________________________________________ Pdweb mailing list Pdweb@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
IOhannes,
Any objections? Can you set this up? Then I'll make blinky.at.or.at:8888 redirect to apt.puredata.info also.
And if you ever want the disk space, feel free to delete whole months of old auto-builds. I do that manually, from time to time.
.hc
On Nov 2, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
sounds good.
-- Marco Donnarumma New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director. Embodied Audio-Visual Interaction Research Team. Department of Computing, Goldsmiths University of London
Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at> wrote: For nightly builds, I'm thinking of scripting it to post the packages to apt.puredata.info/autobuild, unless there is any objections. For backwards compatibility with the old setup, it would be nice to have the old domain name, autobuild.puredata.info, point to apt.puredata.info. No other translation should be necessary. .hc _______________________________________________ Pdweb mailing list Pdweb@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
On 11/11/2012 11:24 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
IOhannes,
Any objections? Can you set this up? Then I'll make blinky.at.or.at:8888 redirect to apt.puredata.info http://apt.puredata.info also.
no objections (sorry for not answering earlier). implemented.
And if you ever want the disk space, feel free to delete whole months of old auto-builds. I do that manually, from time to time.
we gonna see :-)
fgmadr IOhannes
On 11/01/2012 09:37 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
For nightly builds, I'm thinking of scripting it to post the packages to apt.puredata.info/autobuild, unless there is any objections. For backwards compatibility with the old setup, it would be nice to have the old domain name, autobuild.puredata.info, point to apt.puredata.info. No other translation should be necessary.
actually i want to reconsider this.
i'm totally fine with providing web-space for both apt.p.u and autobuild.p.i
but i consider it a bad idea to have the autobuilds be available via apt.p.i as the "primary" place.
i would suggest to keep http://autobuild.puredata.info/ for the autobuilds, and http://apt.puredata.info/ for the apt-installable packages. keeping those names apart makes it so much easier to separate the services if need be. and it doesn't really add any overhead.
so while apt.puredata.info and autobuild.puredata.info _currently_ point to the same page, we should keep them separated on a semantic level.
(actually i wanted to report that the downloads-links for pd-extended/OSX point to the wrong place (apt...), but then i discovered that this is seems to be by intention)
please revert.
fgmadsr IOhannes
On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:28 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:37 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
For nightly builds, I'm thinking of scripting it to post the packages to apt.puredata.info/autobuild, unless there is any objections. For backwards compatibility with the old setup, it would be nice to have the old domain name, autobuild.puredata.info, point to apt.puredata.info. No other translation should be necessary.
actually i want to reconsider this.
i'm totally fine with providing web-space for both apt.p.u and autobuild.p.i
but i consider it a bad idea to have the autobuilds be available via apt.p.i as the "primary" place.
i would suggest to keep http://autobuild.puredata.info/ for the autobuilds, and http://apt.puredata.info/ for the apt-installable packages. keeping those names apart makes it so much easier to separate the services if need be. and it doesn't really add any overhead.
so while apt.puredata.info and autobuild.puredata.info _currently_ point to the same page, we should keep them separated on a semantic level.
(actually i wanted to report that the downloads-links for pd-extended/OSX point to the wrong place (apt...), but then i discovered that this is seems to be by intention)
Makes sense to me.
please revert.
Done.
.hc
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Marco Donnarumma