11 Apr
2007
11 Apr
'07
5:08 p.m.
On 11/04/2007, at 16.28, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
again: just because something is not obivous does not mean it is not visible.
Right. I shall distinguish between those two states/terms. My bad.
This begs for (and makes most sense with) the three states "private", "published", "visible for members only" as defined in an earlier email from you.
It is also similar to the states in the schedule, so it might not complexify the workflow too much.