On Oct 22, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 22/10/2007, at 18.20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Steffen Juul wrote:
Ps. I was thinking about "sorting" the contents in /docs/ tutorial by topic...
"Please do. Any work in /docs is good." ;)
Hep. Plenty of rooms for improvements. like better categories. And more tutorials, not to mention.
I think this tutorial section could be come really good. It has a really lightweight publishing flow which may attract people since they can do a bunch of different things form-wise. And if it's sorted in a meaningful way...
Wrt i've got a question that relates to Pdpedia too: How much "tutorial" like material will be content on pdpedia? Or: Will pdpedia be 99% a object (class) (with meta info) database? I'm not a big fan of double work nor redundancy, that's why i ask.
Best, Steffen
pdpedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, like wikipedia. So tutorials would probably not fit there well. But I think we should also let pdpedia take its own shape. More importantly, I think Pd tutorials should be based around interactive Pd patches, so that wouldn't work with a wiki either.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!