Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looking at other projects, things like an up-to-date FAQ would be nice.
The current status of the FAQ bothers me for quite a while. It's ancient in parts and doesn't reflect anymore, what people really ask on pd-list.
I made some changes and fixes today, but in the longer run I'd like to rework it a bit more. First thing to do would be to add sections to the FAQ, like "General Information", "Installing Pd", "Tips and Tricks" etc.
But before I work on this a bit more, I think the formatting question should be sorted out. For convenience a formatting with auto-TOC-building should or must be used. I won't require reST, which does it, if another format can do this as well, but I don't want to write a TOC manually anymore.
what do you think of the Gem-FAQ (http://gem.iem.at/documentation/faq) i mean not on the actuality level, but on the system level. each FAQ entry is kept separately and associated with one or several categories.
mfgads.r IOhannes