Steffen Juul wrote:
On 22/10/2007, at 11.34, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
a note on layout: i think that the faq should be directly in ./docs/faq and not in ./doc/faq/faq-pd/...)
problem is the there something called ./docs/FAQ which is the GEM faq.
hmm, but the GEM FAQ is somewhere else, so i don't really understand the problem.
That would also reflect the layout (and contents) of ./docs/manuals
by accident (well, i happened to be in the ./docs section today) i stumbled across the ./docs/manual.
it consisted of 3 entries: - Pd manual - Gem manual (empty) - pure-data.org manual (empty, but the description has obviously bee last updated when pure-data.org was still relevant which is some years ago)
i have updated the sections (added puredata.info and put a link to the "site docs" in there, so there is at least some valuable information if you go there; fixed pure-data.org; added a link in the "Gem manual" to actually point to the Gem manual)
all in all i don't think we have to stick to the layout of docs/manuals/ because of it's wide acceptance :-)
fgmadsr. IOhannes