hi, can I join the discussion? I think the front page and main pages should only be editable by webadmins. members should be able to edit their own page. the rest could be the open section (wiki like). esp. documentation, forums, groups, concerts, links should be open for all registered users. plus again my proposal for a youtube like upload section for videos (+ autoconvert module for movie, avi, mp4), sounds (mp3, ogg), pictures, patches, abstractions, externals, settings for patches (like sequencer files). including free tagging/labeling. I learned about drupal and think, it would be an alternative or possible addition to plone. marius.
Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hallo!
ideas:
- totally open page: everybody registered can write (add/modify/delete)
everything everywhere, including the private section of the members 2) open page: everybody registered can write (a/m/d) in all sections BUT the members folders. 3) closed page: only "certain" members can edit the non-members areas
I also prefer 3), but with a few trivial extensions. As i see it, the site is now divided into tree parts: a) the members pages, b) the wiki pages and c) the non-wiki pages, where b) and c) are non-members pages. Hence the wee extension would be:
I am for 2 - I think it's the easiest way, so we don't need more special extensions and whatever ...
To make it consistent with how the CVS repo works, people would then have to apply to be one of those "certain" members, that can edit the non-wiki pages.
But I think this border to apply is too complicated - e.g. I have some time today at night and I am not registered and want to write a small addition to the page - then I don't wait until I'm registered and then maybe in a week I will continue ... I don't do it !
(I think it's different with the code in cvs ...)
Why should this be too open ? - If we see that there are problems we can undo the change ...
LG Georg
pdweb mailing list pdweb@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb