Steffen wrote:
On 11/04/2007, at 17.45, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
does this make sense?
As said earlier it does.
But i'm concerned about the state 'public draft' though. That is, to make it into 'visible for (logged in) members only'. The reason it seam used "incorrect" quite a number of places on the site, which means that making that move might cause trouble?
ok.
you are right that the portal is currently not in the state for this, mostly because all newly created content is automatically in state "public draft" and automatically visible for everybody.
with your consenus i'd like to: - change all content currently in state "public draft" to be "published" - change the default state to "published" (so new content is automatically visible for anybody) - make the "public drafts" to be viewable by members only (and probably rename it to "members only")
is that ok?
The only solution to that, i can think of, is to hide stuff from the menu making it not obviously visible but still accessible.
as said before, i don't like the idea of making content unavailable by moving it out of sight not very much (security by obfuscation that is)
mfa.sdr IOhannes
pdweb mailing list pdweb@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb