Quoting Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org:
Pd-extended is listed first on that page, since a lot more people download pd-extended from that page than pd-vanilla (for the last two releases of each, it's ~70k for PdE and ~24k for PdV). Plus since Pd- extended includes all the work of the community, it makes sense that it would be the primary download on the community site.
i am not saying it shouldn't be listed prominently. however: when i look at that page (with a resolution of 1024x768 which i assume can be considered as "standard"), i basically _only_ see Pd-extended (i know that scrolling is simple, but i am talking about first impressions here)
even though pd-extended might prove more worthy for most of the users, i also think that your statistics are biased because most people will have the feeling that there is _only_ pd-extended (and all the rest is for the weird).
this would probably be less of a problem if pd-ext would be more uptodate in terms of the core components.
fgkasd IOhannes
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.