Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
heyho ;)
Actually I think, that no one is currently working on the graphical side. I would like to change the logo someday, because the color(s) just doesn't match the rest of the page.
okay, so i'll set up an instance with a new design (is there a pd.org ci? or can i do "what i want"? logo too?) as prosposal.
i can show you a kind of a graphical portfolio if you want me to.
don't expect me to finish the portal within the next two weeks, i'm currently very busy :)
(I think it was planned to make a whole skin, but it didn't work out yet obviously).
making skins for plone 1.0 is very risky. the 1.0 skin architecture was pure hell, so migrating from a heavily changed 1.0 skin will be nearly impossible... 2.0 is much more modular. but as i said, most of the time, changes to the templates aren't necessary because nearly everything is changeable with css.
Is your skin visible somewhere?
you can test the skin with the plone 2.0b1 tarball or just see it on test.plone.org. it looks like plone looked in 1.0 (because a part of plone is it's ui) but the code is different: accessible (wcag-aaa - section 508) and flexible (tableless - more ids/classes - more semantic code block positions, id allocation, classification).
And if I understand it correctly, then it would require a plone update, wouldn't it? Then Winfried would have the last word about it.
yes, you would need to update to plone 2.0 which is currently in beta state - we expect it to be final in about 20-30 days.
ciao
regards, michael