Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah. I thought it was ci(1) ("ci - check in RCS revisions")... Well, Pd has a strong tradition of incorporating a kind of "non-design". Pd patches, being multi-platform, use common denominators like Courier or Arial/Helvetica fonts, simple geometric objects build out of 1px, #000 lines, and "flat shaded" 2-color GUI objects. There's a lot of black and white in Pd land.
okay i'll use that :)
This isn't exactly a CI (Miller has stated once or more, that he would like to use a "Pd font" for Pd), but it's the way it is now and is, what people are used to in Pd.
font, and/or a logo? maybe we can work something out :)
And the standard navigation font is too small on Mozilla/Linux.
yes, which is fixed in 2.0 - but you can change that by hand in the stylesheet properties - 65% -> 11px or 10px
Yes, those are what I was talking 'bout. ;)
well we don't use much dtml in these documents - the normal "dtml skin availability" is gone in 2.0
Yeah, well, zpt doesn't look *that* much nicer that dtml, in my opinion.
imo it's quite cool - for simple stuff - if you need to do something very complicated you should use python (please... - don't look at the navigation_tree_slot ... it's like they distilled hitler and stalin)
But my opinion is influenced by a slight aversion to Zope, that isn't really justified, but I was converted to Webware(.sf.net)
i just have heard about it - seems very "basic" in comparison to zope
ciao
fyi - i'll start around saturday next week - 2 reasons: i need a pause (i'm currently working about 18h per day) and we're going to clean up everything in the guy - because after 2.0 we can't do this anymore - this will take a lot of time - nothing is typo safe :)
and, before i'll start to code that stuff i'll post pngs how i think it could look
is there something like a commit contract (like zope.org or plone has)?
regards, michael