This isn't about criticising, it's about finding out what people think. There could definitely be better questions. But I think the website would be a lot better if more people were willing to contribute. Very few do contribute, so I'd like to try to find out if we can change that.
.hc
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:21 PM, marius schebella wrote:
shouldn't it be possible to see all you are asking from the log files? I think a lot of pages could be removed, because they are old (and/ or not used). and the problem is not to criticize, but to find someone who wants to do the work on the page. marius.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am curious why people don't contribute much to puredata.org. I am thinking of making a survey on it. We can use http:// www.surveymonkey.com/ to create it, or something else if anyone knows anything. Anyone interested in helping come up with the questions? Here are some quick ideas: How often do you use puredata.org? How often do you add content to puredata.org? How often do you edit content to puredata.org? How useful is puredata.org? Is it easy to find information on puredata.org? How often do you use the "docs" section? How often do you use the "community" section? How often do you use the "dev" section? Do you find puredata.org responsive? How much does the speed of puredata.org affect your use of the site? .hc
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!
pdweb mailing list pdweb@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
"It is convenient to imagine a power beyond us because that means we don't have to examine our own lives.", from "The Idols of Environmentalism", by Curtis White