On 10/23/06, Adrian <nordbaer@gmail.com> wrote:

;) Good. Who was the guy who overed a graphical skin for plone? Not
the implementation, only a layout. There are good tutorials on the
plone site, and plone.net is a realy nice site which shows what is
possible with plone skinning.

I'm happy that i found at least some people who share the same opinion
as i do :D

On 10/23/06, Kyle Klipowicz <kyleklip@gmail.com > wrote:
> Just wanted to shout out:
> I'm on this list now too, although I know NOTHING about plone!
>
> ~Kyle
>
>
> On 10/21/06, Steffen < stffn@dibidut.dk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 21/10/2006, at 22.28, Adrian wrote:
> >
> > > this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is.
> >
> > check.
> >
> > > are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net to see
> > > what is possible) because changing from plone to something else is not
> > > an option i think. to much work. to much lose.
> >
> > i think grafical changes are a good start. But i also think that
> > structural changes and silk documentation are important to get the
> > best out of it.
> >
> > I am, when i get some time, going to make a proposal. But there have,
> > in my opinion already been made good suggestions. fx:
> >
> > Kyle wrote:
> > > I really do enjoy the layout on the Processing site (http://
> > > processing.org/), since it is very clean and has lots of pictures
> > > and a big fat examples section on the front page.  If we are trying
> > > to market Pd to new users, this is THE most important thing (as
> > > previously asserted).
> > >
> > > I also enjoy their utilization of subdomains.  We could do this
> > > with things like http://gem.puredata.org, http://
> > > gridflow.puredata.org , http://pidip.puredata.org , etc.
> > >
> > > Also, it would be best if the forum was attached to the main
> > > website by at least a prominent link/redirect, if not actually in
> > > server space.  But we definitely need more pictures:  unless you're
> > > trying to show off by running lynx, the internet is not a purely
> > > textual medium.  Besides, the people who actually DO patch Pd
> > > without a GUI probably aren't so interested in visiting a more
> > > marketing-oriented site anyway.  Maybe we could do http://
> > > nogui.puredata.org ?
> >
> > Pete wote:
> > > * What it is, in simple terminology
> > > * What people are doing with it
> > > * How to install it - where to find different versions, and a sub-
> > > page with 'common problems' that people have when installing
> > > * Some simple tutorials with patches (the first howto on the
> > > current page is Miller's book!)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pdweb mailing list
> > pdweb@iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pdweb
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://theradioproject.com
> http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
>
> (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
> (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
> ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
> _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
> ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO

--
another incomplete website: http://conficere.ch/pds